| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | St. Michael's Buzzers | OJHL | 47 | 32 | 64 | 96 | 2.043 | 0.6136 | 0.6192 | 1.3982 | 1.4111 |
| 2001-02 | Topeka Scarecrows | USHL | 61 | 37 | 39 | 76 | 1.246 | 0.7659 | 0.7718 | 3.6707 | 3.6991 |
| 2007-08 | ERC Ingolstadt | DEL | 55 | 31 | 25 | 56 | 1.018 | 1.1135 | 1.1120 | — | — |
| 2008-09 | KalPa | Liiga | 15 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.400 | 1.0000 | 1.0103 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Western Michigan | D1 | — | JR | 35 | 17 | 20 | 37 | 1.057 |
| 2003-04 | Western Michigan | D1 | — | SO | 38 | 13 | 27 | 40 | 1.053 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.