← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Green Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-06-18 Country: USA
2018 · Round 4, Pick #121  ·  Tampa Bay Lightning Tampa Bay Lightning
Signed Professionally
Straubing Tigers · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 USHL 37 0 2 2 0.054 0.0319 0.0339 0.1625 0.1725
2016-17 Lincoln Stars USHL 43 1 14 15 0.349 0.2058 0.2079 1.0476 1.0585
2024-25 Straubing Tigers DEL 41 5 9 14 0.342 0.8538 0.9497 2.8953 3.2205
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Cornell D1 ECAC JR 29 7 9 16 0.552
2018-19 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 20 1 3 4 0.200
2017-18 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 29 2 8 10 0.345
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2017-18 · Cornell
+164.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.