← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Brady Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-06 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Lausitzer Füchse · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Lausitzer Füchse DEL2 26 7 15 22 0.846 0.3651 0.3775
2006-07 Lausitzer Füchse DEL2 26 7 15 22 0.846 0.3651 0.3775
2007-08 Lausitzer Füchse DEL2 26 7 15 22 0.846 0.3651 0.3775
2008-09 Lausitzer Füchse DEL2 26 7 15 22 0.846 0.3651 0.3775
2009-10 Lausitzer Füchse DEL2 26 7 15 22 0.846 0.3651 0.3775
2010-11 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.1001 0.1172 0.2281 0.2670
2011-12 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 47 10 12 22 0.468 0.1406 0.1583 0.3204 0.3608
2012-13 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 40 17 28 45 1.125 0.3379 0.3637 0.7701 0.8289
2013-14 Collingwood Blues OJHL 51 21 39 60 1.177 0.3534 0.3623 0.8053 0.8256
2014-15 Collingwood Blues OJHL 46 43 34 77 1.674 0.5028 0.4895 1.1458 1.1155
2015-16 Lincoln Stars USHL 27 9 15 24 0.889 0.5464 0.5017 2.6189 2.4046
2025-26 Lausitzer Füchse DEL2 26 7 15 22 0.846 0.3651 0.3775
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SR 37 19 15 34 0.919
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 WCHA JR 37 8 13 21 0.568
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SO 38 8 18 26 0.684
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 WCHA 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6729
Forward overall
#341
Forward born in 1995
#142
in DEL2

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.