Grant Mismash Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-19 Country: USA

2017 · Round 2, Pick #61 ·

Nashville Predators

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2015-16	U.S. National U17 Team	NTDP-U18	58	23	21	44	0.759	0.5639	0.5725	2.8306	2.8736
2016-17	U.S. National U18 Team	NTDP-U18	65	26	35	61	0.939	0.6976	0.6739	3.5019	3.3831
2023-24	Östersunds IK	Allsvenskan	16	2	5	7	0.438	1.0938	1.1452	4.1046	4.2975

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2020-21	North Dakota	D1	NCHC	SR	20	10	9	19	0.950
2019-20	North Dakota	D1	NCHC	JR	35	8	12	20	0.571
2018-19	North Dakota	D1	NCHC	SO	24	5	5	10	0.417
2017-18	North Dakota	D1	NCHC	FR	38	9	13	22	0.579

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.59

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.58

2017-18 · North Dakota

-1.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.