IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Passolt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 7 1 3 4 0.571 0.2099 0.2182 0.6031 0.6268
2015-16 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 58 11 11 22 0.379 0.2237 0.2149 1.1392 1.0946
2016-17 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 60 22 20 42 0.700 0.4129 0.3757 2.1024 1.9128
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Western Michigan D1 NCHC GR 38 8 20 28 0.737
2020-21 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 25 7 12 19 0.760
2019-20 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 32 5 11 16 0.500
2018-19 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 36 16 18 34 0.944
2017-18 Western Michigan D1 NCHC FR 35 8 3 11 0.314
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2017-18 · Western Michigan
+17.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9521
Forward overall
#393
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Master
Stevenson · 2018-19
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Niko Schoner
Canton · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mathew Thompson
Adrian · 2013-14
1.536 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.