IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Cockerill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-03 Country: USA
2017 · Round 7, Pick #201  ·  New York Islanders New York Islanders
Signed Professionally
BIK Karlskoga · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 47 6 15 21 0.447 0.3321 0.3377 1.6672 1.6953
2016-17 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 52 14 13 27 0.519 0.3859 0.3734 1.9373 1.8748
2022-23 BIK Karlskoga Allsvenskan 31 7 7 14 0.452 1.1290 1.2143 4.2369 4.5571
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 30 5 6 11 0.367
2020-21 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 12 5 5 10 0.833
2019-20 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 18 2 3 5 0.278
2018-19 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 37 4 7 11 0.297
2017-18 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 37 8 12 20 0.540
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2017-18 · Boston University
+75.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#2822
Forward overall
#112
Forward born in 1999

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.