← New Search ↗ Social Card

Karlis Cukste Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-06-17 Country: Latvia
2015 · Round 5, Pick #130  ·  San Jose Sharks San Jose Sharks
Signed Professionally
Brynäs IF · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Chicago Steel USHL 44 4 11 15 0.341 0.2011 0.2034 1.0239 1.0355
2021-22 Dinamo Riga KHL 34 0 2 2 0.059 0.1470 0.1669 0.8102 0.9197
2023-24 Brynäs IF Allsvenskan 49 0 13 13 0.265 0.6632 0.6388 2.4890 2.3974
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC 34 4 14 18 0.529
2018-19 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC 38 2 18 20 0.526
2017-18 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC 38 3 10 13 0.342
2016-17 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC 38 5 10 15 0.395
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2016-17 · Quinnipiac
+105.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#696
Defenseman overall
#168
Defenseman born in 1997

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.