icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | Sioux Falls Stampede | USHL | 61 | 24 | 20 | 44 | 0.721 | 0.4434 | 0.4817 | 2.1251 | 2.3088 |
| 2002-03 | Sioux Falls Stampede | USHL | 59 | 31 | 36 | 67 | 1.136 | 0.6981 | 0.7151 | 3.3457 | 3.4273 |
| 2013-14 | Dinamo Minsk | KHL | 11 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.273 | 0.6817 | 0.6107 | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Linköping HC | SHL | 54 | 24 | 23 | 47 | 0.870 | 2.1760 | 1.7054 | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Luleå HF | SHL | 52 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 0.635 | 1.5865 | 1.1523 | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Växjö Lakers HC | SHL | 18 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0.500 | 1.2500 | 1.2500 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | SR | 36 | 11 | 27 | 38 | 1.056 |
| 2005-06 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 37 | 16 | 26 | 42 | 1.135 |
| 2004-05 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 42 | 20 | 24 | 44 | 1.048 |
| 2003-04 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 39 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 0.667 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.