| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | U.S. National U17 Team | NTDP-U18 | 32 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 0.500 | 0.3877 | 0.3932 | 1.8610 | 1.8872 |
| 2016-17 | U.S. National U18 Team | NTDP-U18 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.222 | 0.1723 | 0.1663 | 0.8270 | 0.7980 |
| 2023-24 | — | SHL | 35 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.200 | 0.5000 | 0.5518 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Boston College | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 11 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 1.000 |
| 2019-20 | Boston College | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 30 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 1.100 |
| 2018-19 | Boston College | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 36 | 6 | 20 | 26 | 0.722 |
| 2017-18 | Boston College | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 37 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 0.838 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.