← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Gildon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-05-17 Country: USA
2017 · Round 3, Pick #66  ·  Florida Panthers Florida Panthers
Signed Professionally
Adler Mannheim · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 58 1 18 19 0.328 0.2435 0.2501 1.2224 1.2555
2016-17 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 63 11 21 32 0.508 0.3775 0.3692 1.8952 1.8535
2023-24 Adler Mannheim DEL 43 4 5 9 0.209 0.5232 0.6299 1.7745 2.1362
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 34 7 22 29 0.853
2018-19 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 31 6 15 21 0.677
2017-18 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 36 8 15 23 0.639
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2017-18 · New Hampshire
+110.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3251
Defenseman overall
#768
Defenseman born in 1999

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.