Joseph Duszak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-07-22 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2014-15	P.A.L. Junior Islanders	USPHL-Premier-Classic	50	18	39	57	1.140	0.3200	0.3567	0.9373	1.0447
2015-16	P.A.L. Junior Islanders	USPHL-Premier-Classic	42	14	46	60	1.429	0.4010	0.4273	1.5017	1.5260
2022-23	Dinamo Minsk	KHL	68	9	36	45	0.662	1.6545	1.7532	9.1187	9.6625
2024-25	—	KHL	44	4	18	22	0.500	1.2500	1.2177	6.8894	6.7114

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2018-19	Mercyhurst	D1	AHA	JR	37	16	31	47	1.270
2017-18	Mercyhurst	D1	AHA	SO	35	9	22	31	0.886
2016-17	Mercyhurst	D1	AHA	FR	29	5	16	21	0.724

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.38

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.72

2016-17 · Mercyhurst

+92.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.