| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Wayzata High | USHS-MN | 25 | 14 | 4 | 18 | 0.720 | 0.0912 | 0.0923 | 0.1749 | 0.1771 |
| 2015-16 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.167 | 0.0983 | 0.1042 | 0.5007 | 0.5306 |
| 2016-17 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 41 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.342 | 0.2015 | 0.2032 | 1.0257 | 1.0346 |
| 2017-18 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 48 | 5 | 17 | 22 | 0.458 | 0.2704 | 0.2593 | 1.3765 | 1.3201 |
| 2018-19 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 56 | 8 | 37 | 45 | 0.804 | 0.4740 | 0.4301 | 2.4135 | 2.1901 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Northern Michigan | D1 | WCHA | SO | 15 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.200 |
| 2019-20 | Northern Michigan | D1 | WCHA | FR | 37 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 0.351 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.