| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | U.S. National U17 Team | NTDP-U18 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Green Bay Gamblers | USHL | 37 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.081 | 0.0478 | 0.0501 | 0.2436 | 0.2552 |
| 2017-18 | Green Bay Gamblers | USHL | 55 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 0.436 | 0.2574 | 0.2569 | 1.3107 | 1.3080 |
| 2018-19 | — | USHL | 41 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 0.561 | 0.3309 | 0.3131 | 1.6849 | 1.5944 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | RPI | D1 | ECAC | — | 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.062 |
| 2021-22 | RPI | D1 | ECAC | — | 33 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0.182 |
| 2020-21 | RPI | D1 | ECAC | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2019-20 | RPI | D1 | ECAC | FR | 21 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.191 |
| 2019-20 | Rensselaer | D1 | — | FR | 21 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.191 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.