IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gustaf Westlund Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-12-12 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
IK Oskarshamn · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 AIK U20 SuperElit 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0493 0.0531 0.1722 0.1853
2016-17 Lincoln Stars USHL 59 8 27 35 0.593 0.3499 0.3445 1.7800 1.7527
2017-18 Lincoln Stars USHL 58 12 27 39 0.672 0.3966 0.3708 2.0177 1.8867
2023-24 IK Oskarshamn SHL 50 3 4 7 0.140 0.3500 0.3658 1.8257 1.9082
2024-25 IK Oskarshamn Allsvenskan 50 12 12 24 0.480 1.2000 1.1117 4.5010 4.1698
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Ohio State D1 BigTen GR 7 2 3 5 0.714
2021-22 Ohio State D1 BigTen SR 37 8 8 16 0.432
2020-21 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 23 6 3 9 0.391
2019-20 Ohio State D1 BigTen SO 34 12 14 26 0.765
2018-19 Ohio State D1 BigTen FR 25 5 14 19 0.760
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2018-19 · Ohio State
+146.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#2692
Forward overall
#140
Forward born in 1997

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.