IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emil Öhrvall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-10 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Vimmerby HC · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 HV71 U20 SuperElit 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1973 0.2172 0.6888 0.7583
2016-17 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 48 13 19 32 0.667 0.3933 0.3970 2.0006 2.0193
2018-19 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 59 31 32 63 1.068 0.6299 0.5720 3.2041 2.9097
2021-22 BIK Karlskoga Allsvenskan 49 3 5 8 0.163 0.4083 0.4472 1.5313 1.6773
2024-25 Vimmerby HC Allsvenskan 1 0 1 1 1.000 2.5000 2.3777 9.3770 8.9182
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Sacred Heart D1 AHA — 10 1 2 3 0.300
2019-20 Michigan D1 BigTen — 15 2 2 4 0.267
2017-18 RPI D1 ECAC FR 31 2 9 11 0.355
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2017-18 · RPI
+27.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 33 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#6196
Forward overall
#283
Forward born in 1998

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.