Brett Murray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-20 Country: Canada

2016 · Round 4, Pick #99 ·

Buffalo Sabres

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2015-16	Carleton Place Canadians	CCHL	48	14	32	46	0.958	0.2079	0.2247	0.7414	0.8014
2016-17	Youngstown Phantoms	USHL	27	7	13	20	0.741	0.4369	0.4434	2.2246	2.2576
2018-19	Youngstown Phantoms	USHL	62	41	35	76	1.226	0.7231	0.6606	3.6816	3.3634
2025-26	Nürnberg Ice Tigers	DEL	38	17	16	33	0.868	2.1710	2.5260	7.3625	8.5664

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2017-18	Penn State	D1	BigTen	SO	21	1	5	6	0.286
2016-17	Penn State	D1	BigTen	FR	12	0	1	1	0.083

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.19

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.08

2016-17 · Penn State

-56.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 35 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.