IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vincent De Mey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-11-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Madison Capitols USHL 59 12 4 16 0.271 0.1600 0.1572 0.8138 0.7996
2017-18 — USHL 60 21 17 38 0.633 0.3736 0.3485 1.9003 1.7727
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA — 34 7 2 9 0.265
2021-22 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA — 35 6 10 16 0.457
2020-21 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA — 26 7 5 12 0.462
2019-20 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA — 38 15 13 28 0.737
2018-19 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA — 29 5 1 6 0.207
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2018-19 · Northern Michigan
-11.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16581
Forward overall
#745
Forward born in 1997
#1761
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Roman Ammirato
Utica · 2012-13
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Conger
UMass Boston · 2016-17
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.