Nolan Moyle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-13 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2016-17	Green Bay Gamblers	USHL	59	5	10	15	0.254	0.1500	0.1577	0.7635	0.8027
2017-18	Green Bay Gamblers	USHL	57	19	26	45	0.789	0.4657	0.4665	2.3712	2.3753
2023-24	Shanghai Dragons	KHL	55	4	7	11	0.200	0.5000	0.5450	2.7557	3.0036
2024-25	Shanghai Dragons	KHL	12	1	1	2	0.167	0.4167	0.4419	2.2969	2.4357

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2022-23	Michigan	D1	BigTen	GR	40	3	4	7	0.175
2021-22	Michigan	D1	BigTen	SR	36	7	8	15	0.417
2020-21	Michigan	D1	BigTen	JR	25	4	3	7	0.280
2019-20	Michigan	D1	BigTen	SO	33	3	4	7	0.212
2018-19	Michigan	D1	BigTen	FR	30	7	3	10	0.333

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.29

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.33

2018-19 · Michigan

+13.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

92%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6947

Forward overall

#295

Forward born in 1999

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Kalinowski

Endicott · 2015-16

1.310 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Jason Yuel

Curry · 2006-07

1.769 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Nick Ford

Elmira · 2014-15

0.800 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.