IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-08-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bloomington Jefferson High USHS-MN 24 5 21 26 1.083 0.1371 0.1401 0.2630 0.2687
2016-17 — USHL 54 3 9 12 0.222 0.1311 0.1335 0.6668 0.6789
2017-18 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 51 1 17 18 0.353 0.2082 0.2016 1.0589 1.0255
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 39 4 11 15 0.385
2021-22 RPI D1 ECAC — 40 2 14 16 0.400
2020-21 RPI D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 RPI D1 ECAC — 32 0 6 6 0.188
2018-19 RPI D1 ECAC — 35 1 7 8 0.229
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2018-19 · RPI
+38.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6501
Defenseman overall
#1354
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Headland
Canton · 2017-18
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Master
Stevenson · 2017-18
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Willock
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2004-05
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.