| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | Sioux Falls Stampede | USHL | 57 | 6 | 15 | 21 | 0.368 | 0.2173 | 0.2375 | 1.1065 | 1.2091 |
| 2002-03 | Sioux Falls Stampede | USHL | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.200 | 0.1180 | 0.1216 | 0.6007 | 0.6191 |
| 2003-04 | Danville Wings | USHL | 55 | 23 | 30 | 53 | 0.964 | 0.5684 | 0.5558 | 2.8941 | 2.8302 |
| 2013-14 | Iserlohn Roosters | DEL | 52 | 13 | 28 | 41 | 0.788 | 1.9712 | 1.8638 | 6.6851 | 6.3209 |
| 2014-15 | Iserlohn Roosters | DEL | 50 | 10 | 24 | 34 | 0.680 | 1.7000 | 1.5423 | 5.7652 | 5.2304 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Bowling Green | D1 | CCHA | SO | 38 | 11 | 40 | 51 | 1.342 |
| 2004-05 | Bowling Green | D1 | CCHA | FR | 34 | 8 | 23 | 31 | 0.912 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.