← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Janicke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-12-25 Country: USA
2019 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #132  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 NTDP-U18 57 1 5 6 0.105 0.0783 0.0829 0.3919 0.4148
2017-18 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 62 10 8 18 0.290 0.2158 0.2174 1.0805 1.0887
2018-19 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 58 22 26 48 0.828 0.4882 0.5054 2.4383 2.5243
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Notre Dame D1 BigTen GR 32 9 7 16 0.500
2022-23 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 37 8 14 22 0.595
2021-22 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 40 15 9 24 0.600
2020-21 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 29 4 6 10 0.345
2019-20 Notre Dame D1 BigTen FR 37 8 5 13 0.351
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2019-20 · Notre Dame
+5.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

92%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9809
Forward overall
#397
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.