IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Richie Zobak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-08-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 57 4 15 19 0.333 0.1225 0.1333 0.3518 0.3829
2006-07 — NAHL 60 5 17 22 0.367 0.1347 0.1400 0.3871 0.4023
2007-08 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 57 2 10 12 0.210 0.0773 0.0765 0.2222 0.2200
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 27 4 13 17 0.630
2011-12 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 27 3 19 22 0.815
2010-11 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 26 4 12 16 0.615
2009-10 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 25 8 16 24 0.960
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2009-10 · Plymouth State
+897.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14794
Defenseman overall
#1443
Defenseman born in 1988
#4785
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Herdt
Concordia · 2014-15
1.273 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Renaud
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rory Gagnon
Hamilton · 2014-15
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.