IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Donohue Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-12-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 27 3 1 4 0.148 0.0587 0.0591 0.1555 0.1565
2008-09 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 57 7 20 27 0.474 0.1877 0.1796 0.4973 0.4760
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 29 1 4 5 0.172
2011-12 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 28 2 6 8 0.286
2010-11 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 13 2 1 3 0.231
2009-10 St. Norbert D3 — FR 11 0 3 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2009-10 · St. Norbert
+142.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39552
Forward overall
#1316
Forward born in 1988
#4233
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Voisin
SUNY Potsdam · 2007-08
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Bettmeng
Becker · 2017-18
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stefan Decosse
SUNY Geneseo · 2006-07
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.