← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Madden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-11-09 Country: USA
2018 NHL Draft Round 3, Pick #68  ·  Vancouver Canucks Vancouver Canucks
Signed Professionally
Straubing Tigers · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 USHL 50 15 19 34 0.680 0.4180 0.4307 2.0034 2.0644
2025-26 Straubing Tigers DEL 39 20 18 38 0.974 1.0656 1.3094
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 27 19 18 37 1.370
2018-19 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 36 12 16 28 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2018-19 · Northeastern
+111.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.