| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Prior Lake High | USHS-MN | 25 | 4 | 25 | 29 | 1.160 | 0.1469 | 0.1478 | 0.2818 | 0.2835 |
| 2015-16 | Minnesota Magicians | NAHL | 14 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.357 | 0.1312 | 0.1427 | 0.3769 | 0.4099 |
| 2016-17 | Minnesota Magicians | NAHL | 49 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 0.408 | 0.1500 | 0.1550 | 0.4309 | 0.4453 |
| 2017-18 | Cedar Rapids RoughRiders | USHL | 40 | 4 | 26 | 30 | 0.750 | 0.4424 | 0.4215 | 2.2526 | 2.1461 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2020-21 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2019-20 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2018-19 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | FR | 14 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.143 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.