IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Blackmun Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-04-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Janesville Jets NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 55 4 21 25 0.455 0.2681 0.2682 1.3638 1.3641
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Notre Dame D1 BigTen — 34 2 9 11 0.324
2021-22 Notre Dame D1 BigTen — 40 2 14 16 0.400
2020-21 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast JR 19 6 5 11 0.579
2019-20 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 34 5 12 17 0.500
2018-19 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 32 5 9 14 0.438
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2018-19 · UMass Lowell
+72.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3764
Defenseman overall
#898
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Jeff Taylor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Clay Anderson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jaccob Slavin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Gavin Bayreuther
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Ulve
St. Norbert · 2020-21
0.552 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Robbie Murden
Hamilton · 2010-11
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Daigle
Marian · 2000-01
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.