← New Search ↗ Social Card

Filip Forsmark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-23 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
IF Troja-Ljungby · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Frölunda HC U20 SHL-J20 10 2 2 4 0.400 0.2221 0.2341 0.5325 0.5612
2016-17 Örebro HK U20 SuperElit 43 9 29 38 0.884 0.3487 0.3540 1.2175 1.2361
2017-18 Tri-City Storm USHL 58 10 12 22 0.379 0.2237 0.2151 1.1382 1.0944
2018-19 Tri-City Storm USHL 62 14 38 52 0.839 0.4947 0.4501 2.5167 2.2899
2025-26 IF Troja-Ljungby Allsvenskan 49 6 14 20 0.408 1.0205 1.0036 3.8277 3.7641
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast GR 35 5 13 18 0.514
2022-23 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SR 37 6 10 16 0.432
2021-22 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 33 11 16 27 0.818
2020-21 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SO 18 4 9 13 0.722
2019-20 Merrimack D1 NE10 — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#3244
Forward overall
#169
Forward born in 1998

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.