IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wojciech Stachowiak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-03 Country: Germany
Signed Professionally
DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 — DNL 44 15 21 36 0.818 0.1263 0.1322 0.5252 0.5499
2016-17 — DNL 33 19 34 53 1.606 0.2480 0.2423 1.0310 1.0072
2017-18 — USHL 38 9 10 19 0.500 0.2949 0.2987 1.5017 1.5209
2018-19 — DNL 2 1 2 3 1.500 0.2316 0.2224 0.9628 0.9244
2019-20 — DEL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.3125 0.3125 1.0598 1.0598
2020-21 — DEL 25 3 3 6 0.240 0.6000 0.6000 2.0348 2.0348
2021-22 — DEL 47 2 3 5 0.106 0.2660 0.3434 0.9021 1.1646
2022-23 — DEL 56 16 18 34 0.607 1.5177 1.9147 5.1471 6.4935
2023-24 — DEL 51 11 17 28 0.549 1.3725 1.6611 4.6545 5.6333
2024-25 — DEL 52 10 20 30 0.577 1.4423 1.6793 4.8911 5.6950
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 13 0 1 1 0.077
2018-19 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 27 4 0 4 0.148
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2018-19 · Michigan State
-37.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#3688
Forward overall
#152
Forward born in 1999
#3
in DNL

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.