IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Albrecht Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-10-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — NAHL 54 23 14 37 0.685 0.2715 0.2606 0.7194 0.6905
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 24 2 8 10 0.417
2013-14 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 21 2 12 14 0.667
2012-13 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 2 0 1 1 0.500
2011-12 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 24 4 10 14 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2011-12 · Wesleyan
+161.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18597
Forward overall
#736
Forward born in 1990
#1135
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Zilka
Hamline · 2006-07
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxwell Reavis
UMass Boston · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Payton Kender
Rivier · 2024-25
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.