IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Miglio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-11-05 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Selber Wölfe · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 46 4 12 16 0.348 0.1278 0.1292 0.3671 0.3712
2011-12 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 55 14 12 26 0.473 0.1737 0.1671 0.4989 0.4799
2021-22 Selber Wölfe DEL2 51 21 14 35 0.686 0.9194 0.8432 1.2315 1.1294
2022-23 Selber Wölfe DEL2 51 22 25 47 0.922 1.2346 0.9638 1.6537 1.2910
2023-24 Selber Wölfe DEL2 50 19 21 40 0.800 1.0717 0.8065 1.4355 1.0803
2024-25 Selber Wölfe DEL2 50 11 12 23 0.460 0.6162 0.4322 0.8254 0.5789
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Utica D3 UCHC SR 27 7 9 16 0.593
2014-15 Utica D3 UCHC JR 24 3 5 8 0.333
2013-14 Utica D3 UCHC SO 13 4 1 5 0.385
2012-13 Utica D3 UCHC FR 12 1 3 4 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2012-13 · Utica
+156.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17009
Forward overall
#640
Forward born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Connolly
Buffalo State · 2021-22
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rihards Marenis
Aurora · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Teddy Purcell
SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.