IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-11-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — NAHL 47 6 4 10 0.213 0.0790 0.0839 0.2253 0.2392
2011-12 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 50 26 12 38 0.760 0.2822 0.2857 0.8047 0.8148
2012-13 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 53 11 19 30 0.566 0.2102 0.2023 0.5993 0.5767
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SO 11 1 2 3 0.273
2013-14 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA FR 27 5 3 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2013-14 · Lake Superior State
+46.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19791
Forward overall
#859
Forward born in 1992
#1850
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Primo Self
Endicott · 2021-22
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Harguindeguy
Concordia · 2021-22
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyler Matthews
Canton · 2017-18
0.941 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.