IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick DeCenzo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-01-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 57 9 17 26 0.456 0.1693 0.1728 0.4829 0.4929
2012-13 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 8 17 25 0.431 0.1600 0.1553 0.4563 0.4429
2013-14 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 9 23 32 0.552 0.2048 0.1885 0.5841 0.5376
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Army D1 AHA SR 36 1 6 7 0.194
2016-17 Army D1 AHA JR 37 2 6 8 0.216
2015-16 Army D1 AHA SO 32 7 6 13 0.406
2014-15 Army D1 AHA FR 31 3 7 10 0.323
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2014-15 · Army
+115.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22539
Forward overall
#849
Forward born in 1993
#2318
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cory Anderson
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Doyle
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carlos Fornaris
New England College · 2015-16
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.