Greg Gibson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-31 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2007-08	Burlington Cougars	OJHL	1	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2009-10	—	OJHL	45	13	25	38	0.844	0.2537	0.2515	0.5780	0.5730
2010-11	—	OJHL	48	31	36	67	1.396	0.4193	0.3961	0.9554	0.9026
2011-12	Amarillo Bulls	NAHL	52	23	31	54	1.038	0.4115	0.3802	1.0903	1.0073
2018-19	Heilbronner Falken	DEL2	51	35	31	66	1.294	0.5583	0.5247	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2015-16	Robert Morris	D1	—	SR	39	29	22	51	1.308
2014-15	Robert Morris	D1	—	JR	32	15	10	25	0.781
2013-14	Robert Morris	D1	—	SO	41	15	16	31	0.756
2012-13	Robert Morris	D1	—	FR	38	7	3	10	0.263

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.33

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.26

2012-13 · Robert Morris

-20.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

72%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5969

Forward overall

#262

Forward born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

Carter Davis

St. Scholastica · 2007-08

0.538 Average

actual D2/3 PPG

Cullen Bradshaw

St. Norbert · 2010-11

0.968 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Casey Shade

Wentworth · 2007-08

1.407 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.