← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Gibson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-31 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Heilbronner Falken · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Burlington Cougars OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 — OJHL 45 13 25 38 0.844 0.2070 0.2052 0.5812 0.5761
2010-11 — OJHL 48 31 36 67 1.396 0.3421 0.3232 0.9607 0.9076
2011-12 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 52 23 31 54 1.038 0.3815 0.3525 1.0976 1.0140
2018-19 Heilbronner Falken DEL2 51 35 31 66 1.294 1.7336 1.6294 2.3219 2.1824
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 39 29 22 51 1.308
2014-15 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 32 15 10 25 0.781
2013-14 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 41 15 16 31 0.756
2012-13 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 38 7 3 10 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2012-13 · Robert Morris
-9.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 16 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#6351
Forward overall
#268
Forward born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2015-16
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.