← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grant Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-09-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Wayzata High USHS-MN 24 1 4 5 0.208 0.0264 0.0284 0.0506 0.0545
2017-18 USHL 46 2 6 8 0.174 0.1026 0.1050 0.5223 0.5343
2018-19 Omaha Lancers USHL 62 8 13 21 0.339 0.1998 0.1941 1.0173 0.9882
2019-20 Omaha Lancers USHL 50 6 14 20 0.400 0.2360 0.2360 1.2014 1.2014
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 34 0 3 3 0.088
2022-23 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 13 0 2 2 0.154
2021-22 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 18 1 5 6 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2020-21 · Sacred Heart
+122.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6742
Defenseman overall
#1463
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Roger Williams · 2023-24
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.