IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Wishman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-11-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 49 0 7 7 0.143 0.0525 0.0558 0.1508 0.1603
2017-18 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 51 0 6 6 0.118 0.0694 0.0682 0.3532 0.3470
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Niagara D1 AHA GR 19 0 1 1 0.053
2021-22 Niagara D1 AHA SR 32 1 6 7 0.219
2020-21 Niagara D1 AHA JR 18 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Niagara D1 AHA SO 29 0 3 3 0.103
2018-19 Niagara D1 AHA FR 31 0 4 4 0.129
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2018-19 · Niagara
+116.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22972
Defenseman overall
#3017
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Akezhan Melis
Albertus Magnus · 2022-23
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mario Tropea
Neumann · 2016-17
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Bennett
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.