IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chad Bennett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-10-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Brampton Capitals OJHL 55 16 15 31 0.564 0.1381 0.1419 0.3880 0.3986
2010-11 Brampton Capitals OJHL 50 22 27 49 0.980 0.2402 0.2356 0.6747 0.6618
2011-12 — OJHL 48 15 26 41 0.854 0.2094 0.1961 0.5881 0.5509
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 17 3 3 6 0.353
2012-13 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 17 4 2 6 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2012-13 · Fredonia
+94.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21638
Forward overall
#788
Forward born in 1991
#899
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonathan Grebosky
Concordia · 2013-14
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zac Sikich
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Krenke
Saint John's · 2024-25
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.