IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zac Sikich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-10-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 44 18 21 39 0.886 0.1112 0.1152 0.2798 0.2898
2012-13 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 44 18 21 39 0.886 0.1112 0.1096 — —
2013-14 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 29 15 21 36 1.241 0.1558 0.1476 0.3919 0.3712
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SR 25 10 15 25 1.000
2016-17 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 26 10 5 15 0.577
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 26 10 5 15 0.577
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 25 6 5 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2014-15 · SUNY Brockport
+288.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22574
Forward overall
#787
Forward born in 1993
#542
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liam Feeney
Trinity · 2015-16
0.710 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Zalba
Neumann · 2008-09
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Reynolds
Saint Anselm · 2024-25
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.