IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zac Sikich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-10-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 44 18 21 39 0.886 0.1068 0.1106 0.2800 0.2900
2012-13 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 44 18 21 39 0.886 0.1068 0.1053 — —
2013-14 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 29 15 21 36 1.241 0.1496 0.1417 0.3922 0.3714
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 — SR 25 10 15 25 1.000
2016-17 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 26 10 5 15 0.577
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 26 10 5 15 0.577
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 25 6 5 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2014-15 · SUNY Brockport
+304.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32165
Forward overall
#1264
Forward born in 1993
#679
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liam Feeney
Trinity · 2015-16
0.710 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Zalba
Neumann · 2008-09
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Riddell
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.