← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Ferguson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-06 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Rögle BK · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 54 10 21 31 0.574 0.2132 0.2246 0.6079 0.6404
2013-14 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 60 19 29 48 0.800 0.2970 0.2980 0.8470 0.8498
2020-21 Rögle BK SHL 52 5 13 18 0.346
2021-22 Rögle BK SHL 52 6 17 23 0.442
2022-23 Rögle BK SHL 52 9 16 25 0.481
2023-24 Rögle BK SHL 48 6 11 17 0.354
2024-25 Rögle BK SHL 48 10 10 20 0.417
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 41 18 31 49 1.195
2016-17 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 38 24 34 58 1.526
2015-16 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 39 13 21 34 0.872
2014-15 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 34 11 15 26 0.765
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2014-15 · Robert Morris
+232.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13411
Forward overall
#558
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Bentley (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia Wisconsin · 2011-12
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2017-18
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2022-23
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.