IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Ferguson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-06 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Rögle BK · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 54 10 21 31 0.574 0.2109 0.2222 0.6060 0.6384
2013-14 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 60 19 29 48 0.800 0.2939 0.2949 0.8444 0.8472
2020-21 Rögle BK SHL 52 5 13 18 0.346 0.8655 0.8655 4.5174 4.5174
2021-22 Rögle BK SHL 52 6 17 23 0.442 1.1058 1.0727 5.7714 5.5986
2022-23 Rögle BK SHL 52 9 16 25 0.481 1.2020 1.1377 6.2738 5.9379
2023-24 Rögle BK SHL 48 6 11 17 0.354 0.8855 0.7809 4.6218 4.0760
2024-25 Rögle BK SHL 48 10 10 20 0.417 1.0417 0.8577 5.4374 4.4769
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 41 18 31 49 1.195
2016-17 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 38 24 34 58 1.526
2015-16 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 39 13 21 34 0.872
2014-15 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 34 11 15 26 0.765
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2014-15 · Robert Morris
+236.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1414
Forward overall
#91
Forward born in 1994

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.