IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ivan Chukarov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-04-03 Country: USA
2015 · Round 7, Pick #182  ·  Buffalo Sabres Buffalo Sabres
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 44 4 8 12 0.273 0.1002 0.1034 0.2878 0.2970
2014-15 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 55 12 31 43 0.782 0.2872 0.2813 0.8252 0.8083
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 UMass D1 HockeyEast SR 25 1 2 3 0.120
2017-18 UMass D1 HockeyEast JR 31 0 6 6 0.194
2016-17 UMass D1 HockeyEast SO 36 2 6 8 0.222
2015-16 UMass D1 HockeyEast FR 36 3 5 8 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2015-16 · UMass
+12.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5318
Defenseman overall
#910
Defenseman born in 1995
#1839
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeremy Olinyk
St. Norbert · 2011-12
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Lloyd
Elmira · 2014-15
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Zuccaro
Plymouth State · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.