IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Kleven Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-04-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 26 1 3 4 0.154 0.0571 0.0591 0.1628 0.1684
2014-15 Mason City Toros NA3HL 44 5 33 38 0.864 0.1041 0.1014 0.2728 0.2658
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SR 27 2 10 12 0.444
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 26 2 6 8 0.308
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 25 3 10 13 0.520
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 29 6 6 12 0.414
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2015-16 · Wisconsin-Stout
+419.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15328
Defenseman overall
#1868
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Nick
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Rivera
Fredonia · 2013-14
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Bondy
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike McPherson
UMass Dartmouth · 2016-17
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.