icepath.io · Hockey Analytics

← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Costello Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-27 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2013-14	Corpus Christi IceRays	NAHL	13	1	0	1	0.077	0.0286	0.0304	0.0814	0.0867
2014-15	—	NA3HL	43	13	19	32	0.744	0.0897	0.0901	0.2351	0.2361
2015-16	New Ulm Steel	NA3HL	45	33	30	63	1.400	0.1687	0.1612	0.4423	0.4227

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2016-17	Wisconsin-Stout	D3	BigTen	FR	1	0	0	0	0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#35403

Forward overall

#1491

Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG

→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)

0.20 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Nick DeCenzo

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG

→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)

0.16 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Cullen Hurley

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG

→ Wisconsin

0.23 No data

NCAAe PPG

Tyler Deresky

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG

→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)

0.28 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Evan Ritt

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG

→ Denver

0.24 No data

NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Thompson

St. Norbert · 2012-13

0.767 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Dustin Skinner

Nichols · 2007-08

0.700 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Cole Klippenstein

Southern Maine · 2012-13

0.520 Average

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.