icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Salmon Arm Silverbacks | BCHL | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Minnesota Wilderness | NAHL | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Philadelphia Little Flyers | EHL | 42 | 21 | 32 | 53 | 1.262 | 0.4441 | 0.4334 | 0.6187 | 0.6038 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Oswego | D1 | — | SR | 16 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.188 |
| 2018-19 | SUNY Oswego | D3 | — | SR | 16 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.188 |
| 2017-18 | SUNY Oswego | D3 | — | JR | 25 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 0.840 |
| 2016-17 | SUNY Oswego | D3 | — | SO | 15 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.200 |
| 2015-16 | SUNY Oswego | D3 | — | FR | 27 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.148 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.