IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Brickley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-03-30 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Tappara · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 61 5 27 32 0.525 0.1138 0.1149 0.4059 0.4100
2014-15 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 58 12 25 37 0.638 0.2344 0.2295 0.6733 0.6592
2022-23 — Allsvenskan 51 7 26 33 0.647 1.6178 1.4225 6.0710 5.3381
2023-24 MoDo Hockey SHL 52 4 13 17 0.327 0.8173 0.7437 4.2656 3.8815
2024-25 Tappara Liiga 58 9 28 37 0.638 1.5948 1.3524 5.4835 4.6501
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Minnesota State D1 WCHA JR 40 10 25 35 0.875
2016-17 Minnesota State D1 WCHA SO 31 8 23 31 1.000
2015-16 Minnesota State D1 WCHA FR 36 2 9 11 0.306
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2015-16 · Minnesota State
+76.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#73
Defenseman overall
#42
Defenseman born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.