IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tobias Fladeby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-20 Country: Norway
Signed Professionally
Tingsryds AIF · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 47 12 15 27 0.575 0.2111 0.2094 0.6064 0.6014
2016-17 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 60 26 27 53 0.883 0.3245 0.3042 0.9323 0.8740
2021-22 Tingsryds AIF Allsvenskan 47 17 17 34 0.723 1.8085 1.7951 6.7869 6.7365
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 American International D1 AHA SR 16 10 8 18 1.125
2019-20 American International D1 AHA JR 32 12 11 23 0.719
2018-19 American International D1 AHA SO 40 18 8 26 0.650
2017-18 American International D1 AHA FR 32 1 6 7 0.219
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2017-18 · American International
-4.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 36 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#1560
Forward overall
#86
Forward born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.