IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron McPheters Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-03-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 52 3 17 20 0.385 0.1413 0.1461 0.4059 0.4197
2016-17 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 47 3 24 27 0.575 0.2111 0.2068 0.6064 0.5941
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 30 0 1 1 0.033
2018-19 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 23 1 1 2 0.087
2017-18 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 17 0 4 4 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2017-18 · Alaska Anchorage
+36.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6872
Defenseman overall
#1304
Defenseman born in 1997
#2481
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Garrett Alberti
Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexander Babich
Trine · 2022-23
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Johanson
Trine · 2015-16
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.