IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pieter von Steinbergs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-04-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Minnetonka High USHS-MN 25 5 7 12 0.480 0.0608 0.0582 0.1166 0.1116
2015-16 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 49 2 11 13 0.265 0.0975 0.1013 0.2800 0.2909
2016-17 — NAHL 50 5 13 18 0.360 0.1323 0.1303 0.3800 0.3742
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Amherst D3 NESCAC — 24 3 12 15 0.625
2019-20 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 24 5 10 15 0.625
2018-19 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 24 3 9 12 0.500
2017-18 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 24 2 2 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2017-18 · Amherst
+48.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13054
Defenseman overall
#1978
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Maxim Tsegelnik
Albertus Magnus · 2022-23
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Finlason
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nikita Sobolev
New England College · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.