IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kalle Eriksson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-09-15 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Almtuna IS · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Leksands IF U20 SHL-J20 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Leksands IF U20 SHL-J20 39 4 9 13 0.333 0.1851 0.1966 0.4437 0.4714
2017-18 Leksands IF U20 SuperElit 34 5 8 13 0.382 0.1509 0.1528 0.5268 0.5335
2018-19 — USHL 63 7 29 36 0.571 0.3371 0.3275 1.7146 1.6655
2023-24 Almtuna IS Allsvenskan 35 1 3 4 0.114 0.2858 0.3074 1.0718 1.1527
2024-25 Almtuna IS Allsvenskan 38 1 3 4 0.105 0.2632 0.2670 0.9874 1.0015
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SR 33 2 4 6 0.182
2021-22 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 32 0 12 12 0.375
2020-21 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 23 6 12 18 0.783
2019-20 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 33 0 6 6 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2019-20 · New Hampshire
-25.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3497
Defenseman overall
#836
Defenseman born in 1999

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Blasko
Nazareth · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2016-17
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2015-16
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.