IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Morrissey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-11-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 56 10 11 21 0.375 0.1378 0.1395 0.3958 0.4007
2017-18 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 60 14 19 33 0.550 0.2021 0.1946 0.5805 0.5590
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Colby D3 NESCAC SR 22 5 13 18 0.818
2020-21 Colby D3 NESCAC JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Colby D3 NESCAC SO 24 6 4 10 0.417
2018-19 Colby D3 NESCAC FR 23 8 1 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2018-19 · Colby
+164.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29574
Forward overall
#1360
Forward born in 1997
#2642
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Billy Vizzo
Endicott · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Payton Kender
Rivier · 2024-25
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Dillon
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.