IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Fedorek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 26 0 4 4 0.154 0.0565 0.0610 0.1623 0.1753
2017-18 — NAHL 45 1 12 13 0.289 0.1061 0.1093 0.3049 0.3142
2018-19 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 55 8 24 32 0.582 0.2138 0.2108 0.6141 0.6054
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Utica D3 UCHC — 29 4 21 25 0.862
2021-22 Ferris State D1 CCHA JR 12 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 24 0 3 3 0.125
2019-20 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 31 1 4 5 0.161
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2019-20 · Ferris State
0.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10063
Defenseman overall
#1928
Defenseman born in 1999
#3548
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelby Lorenz
Southern Maine · 2011-12
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Vassallo
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Soloway
Colby · 2022-23
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.