IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Louis Boudon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-10-04 Country: France
Signed Professionally
Nybro Vikings IF · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Metro Jets NA3HL 46 38 43 81 1.761 0.1948 0.2041 1.0499 1.1089
2017-18 Northeast Generals NAHL 51 17 32 49 0.961 0.3413 0.3436 1.0087 1.0155
2018-19 Northeast Generals NAHL 55 22 46 68 1.236 0.4392 0.4225 1.2981 1.2487
2024-25 Nybro Vikings IF Allsvenskan 47 9 12 21 0.447 1.1170 1.0801 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SR 36 10 14 24 0.667
2021-22 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA JR 36 15 29 44 1.222
2020-21 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SO 27 8 11 19 0.704
2019-20 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA FR 40 6 21 27 0.675
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2019-20 · Lake Superior State
+101.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#2619
Forward overall
#137
Forward born in 1998

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Schremp
Elmira · 2003-04
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Ouderkirk
Norwich · 2017-18
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott McNulty
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.